Perfectionism determined by others and perfectionism for others correlate negatively with subjective well-being, while self-perfectionism does not correlate significantly¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q2·i0–i1
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i1 Perfectionism determined by others (r = -.13) and perfectionism for others (r = -.13) each correlated negatively and significantly with subjective well-being. → Karatas 2012
q2 i0 Self-perfectionism showed no significant correlation with subjective well-being (r = .09, unstarred in Table 1). → Karatas 2012 (2)
Evidence¶
Karatas 2012¶
Karatas, Z. & Tagay, O. (2012). Self Esteem, Locus of Control and Multidimensional Perfectionism as the Predictors of Subjective Well Being. International Education Studies, 5(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n6p131
q2 · i1 · associational · r2
Pearson correlation analysis (Table 1, n=318). The two final columns, perfectionism determined by others and perfectionism for others, each show "-.13*" with subjective well-being, i.e. r = -.13, significant at p<.05.
"Subjective well being 174.35 27.08 - .53** -.26** .09 -.13* -.13*"
Karatas 2012 (2)¶
Karatas, Z. & Tagay, O. (2012). Self Esteem, Locus of Control and Multidimensional Perfectionism as the Predictors of Subjective Well Being. International Education Studies, 5(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n6p131
q2 · i0 · associational · r2
Authors' summary of Table 1 (n=318): all scales except "the sub-scale for self-perfectionism" correlated significantly with subjective well-being; the self-perfectionism coefficient of r = .09 was not significant. Equivalence was not tested.
"the relationships of the other scales, outside of the sub-scale for self-perfectionism, with the points taken from the subjectiv e well-being scale is significant at the level of p<.05, p<.01"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Locus of control is negatively correlated with and predicts subjective well-being, ranking second after self-esteem — related
- Self-esteem is positively correlated with subjective well-being among final-year education faculty students — related
- Self-esteem, locus of control and multidimensional perfectionism together significantly predict subjective well-being, jointly accounting for 34.8% of variance, with self-esteem the largest contributor at 28% — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
perfectionism-dimensions-negative-null-subjective-well-being |
title |
Perfectionism determined by others and perfectionism for others correlate negatively with subjective well-being, while self-perfectionism does not correlate significantly |
description |
Perfectionism determined by others and perfectionism for others correlate negatively with subjective well-being, while self-perfectionism does not correlate significantly |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2012 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — karatas-2012, karatas-2012-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.