Claims

Longitudinal associations between teacher–student and peer relationship quality are smaller than cross-sectional ones, with teacher–student relationships somewhat more predictive of peer relationships than vice versa

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Longitudinal effect sizes were significantly smaller than cross-sectional associations for both the teacher-first and peer-first subsamples. → Endedijk 2022 q3 i? The teacher–student-to-peer association was significantly larger in the teacher-first than the peer-first subsample, suggesting somewhat stronger predictive power of teacher–student relationships toward peer relationships. → Endedijk 2022 (2)

Evidence

Endedijk 2022

Endedijk, H. M., Breeman, L. D., van Lissa, C. J., Hendrickx, M. M. H. G., den Boer, L., & Mainhard, T. (2022). The Teacher's Invisible Hand: A Meta-Analysis of the Relevance of Teacher–Student Relationship Quality for Peer Relationships and the Contribution of Student Behavior. Review of Educational Research, 92(3), 370–412. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211051428

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Metaregression comparing cross-sectional, teacher-first, and peer-first subsamples while controlling for same-rater effects. Longitudinal effect sizes were "smaller than the cross-sectional associations", F(2, 1421) = 31.15, p < .001.

"for both the teacher-first subsample (b = −.05, 95% CI [−.07, −.03], p < .001) and the peer-first subsample (b = −.07, 95% CI [−.09, −.05], p < .001), longitudinal effect sizes were smaller than the cross-sectional associations, F(2, 1421) = 31.15, p < .001."

Endedijk 2022 (2)

Endedijk, H. M., Breeman, L. D., van Lissa, C. J., Hendrickx, M. M. H. G., den Boer, L., & Mainhard, T. (2022). The Teacher's Invisible Hand: A Meta-Analysis of the Relevance of Teacher–Student Relationship Quality for Peer Relationships and the Contribution of Student Behavior. Review of Educational Research, 92(3), 370–412. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211051428

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r?

Pairwise comparison of the two longitudinal subsamples in the same metaregression: the association was "significantly larger for the teacher-first subsample than for the peer-first subsample" (b = −.02, p = .015).

"A comparison of the estimates of the peer-first subsample with the teacher-first subsample revealed that the association between teacher–student and peer relationships was significantly larger for the teacher-first subsample than for the peer-first subsample (b = −.02, 95% CI [−.04, .00], p = .015)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id longitudinal-tsr-peer-effects-smaller-teacher-first-stronger
title Longitudinal associations between teacher–student and peer relationship quality are smaller than cross-sectional ones, with teacher–student relationships somewhat more predictive of peer relationships than vice versa
description Longitudinal associations between teacher–student and peer relationship quality are smaller than cross-sectional ones, with teacher–student relationships somewhat more predictive of peer relationships than vice versa
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-20
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — endedijk-2022, endedijk-2022-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.