Claims

Most participants held low initial expectations for adapted exercise classes based on negative previous experiences, an identified barrier to participation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2021: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Most participants reported low expectations for class design, exercise rigor, and assistant knowledge, based on previous experiences with adapted programming. → Dysterheft 2016

Evidence

Dysterheft 2016

Dysterheft, J., Chaparro, G., Rice, L., & Rice, I. (2016). Investigating the Outcomes and Perceptions of an Inclusive Aquatic Exercise Class for University Students with Physical Disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 31(1), 41-56. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Investigating+the+Outcomes+and+Perceptions+of+an+Inclusive+Aquatic+Exercise+Class

q2 · i? · qualitative · r3

Qualitative theme on initial perceptions from the intervention interviews. "Most participants reported low expectations for the class design, rigor of exercise programming, and knowledge or dedication of the exercise personal assistants," which the authors interpret as a previously unknown barrier to recreational physical activity participation.

"Alarmingly, most participants reported low expectations for the class design, rigor of exercise programming, and knowledge or dedication of the exercise personal assistants."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.