Teachers allocated on average five percent of intervention sessions to predicting and purpose setting, with fidelity of implementation averaging 45.4%¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Across the intervention, the mean percentage of session time on engaged reader processes was 5.0 and mean fidelity of implementation was 45.4%. → Fatima Zehra Allahverdi 2025
Evidence¶
Fatima Zehra Allahverdi 2025¶
Fatima Zehra Allahverdi, Lynn Gelzheiser. (2025). Comparison of more effective and typical teachers' instructional quality and implementation of engaged reader processes. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09725-8
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Descriptive statistics for the 85-student quantitative sample show CLASSIC percentage mean 5.0 (SD 3.0) and fidelity percentage mean 45.4 (SD 26.0). The authors suggest low values may reflect teachers addressing other comprehension topics and sessions devoted to reading and discussion.
"On average, five percent of the 50 intervention sessions focused on the engaged reader processes of predicting and purpose setting (see Table 4). Moreover, the instruction on the engaged reader processes was not always of high fidelity, with an average of only 45.4%."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Fidelity of implementation and percentage of instructional time on engaged reader processes added only 2% explained variance to comprehension post-test scores beyond controls — related
- Homogeneous comprehension-needs groups spent less time on engaged reader processes but received better-aligned instruction than heterogeneous groups — related
- Typical-gain teacher's students received the most inappropriate directions and prompts for setting a purpose and were seldom reminded to return to the purpose with evidence — related
- Tutoring sessions were implemented with high procedural fidelity (mean 93.4%)
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
low-time-and-fidelity-engaged-reader-processes |
title |
Teachers allocated on average five percent of intervention sessions to predicting and purpose setting, with fidelity of implementation averaging 45.4% |
description |
Teachers allocated on average five percent of intervention sessions to predicting and purpose setting, with fidelity of implementation averaging 45.4% |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — fatima-zehra-allahverdi-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.