Tutoring sessions were implemented with high procedural fidelity (mean 93.4%)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Observation of 25.8% of sessions with a 210-item checklist showed mean implementation accuracy of 93.4%, ranging from 75.7% to 99.5%. → Mackiewicz 2011

Evidence¶

Mackiewicz 2011¶

Mackiewicz, S. M., Wood, C. L., Cooke, N. L., & Mazzotti, V. L. (2011). Effects of Peer Tutoring With Audio Prompting on Vocabulary Acquisition for Struggling Readers. Remedial and Special Education, 32(4), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510362507

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Treatment fidelity check on peer tutoring sessions: the first and fourth authors observed 25.8% of sessions distributed evenly across pairs using a 210-item checklist, finding "a mean accuracy of 93.4%".

"Results indicated that tutoring sessions were implemented with a mean accuracy of 93.4% (ranging from 75.7% to 99.5%)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Lesson-probe data paths showed clear separation favoring the peer tutoring condition for most probes across all eight participants
• Teachers implemented Preschool PATHS with high fidelity and positive engagement in the trial
• Teachers allocated on average five percent of intervention sessions to predicting and purpose setting, with fidelity of implementation averaging 45.4%
• Both included studies report high-fidelity implementation of eMINTS
• Adding reciprocal peer tutoring with audio prompting to incidental exposure produced stronger vocabulary gains than incidental exposure alone for fourth-grade struggling readers — related
• Most ERWC teachers completed required professional learning (82-99 percent), but only 0-3 percent taught the curriculum with fidelity across the three study years — related