Claims

Teachers perceived lower ability students benefited most from the paired reading programme, in both tutor and tutee roles

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Lower ability students were perceived by teachers to have benefitted most from the co-operative learning structure of paired reading, whether in the role of tutee or tutor. → Cockerill et al. 2018

Evidence

Cockerill et al. 2018

Maria Cockerill, Nicole Craig, Allen Thurston. (2018). TEACHER PERCEPTIONS OF THE IMPACT OF PEER LEARNING IN THEIR CLASSROOMS: USING SOCIAL INTERDEPENDENCE THEORY AS A MODEL FOR DATA ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION. International Journal of Education and Practice, 6(1): 14-27. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2018.61.14.27

q2 · i? · qualitative · r3

Qualitative teacher case study and survey responses. One teacher reported "Lower ability Y7 students benefitted the most from this. The confident readers didn‟t gain as much." Teachers linked the tutor role to improved confidence, behaviour and focused engagement.

"Lower ability students, commonly a difficult to reach group of students, was perceived by teachers to have benefitted most from the co -operative learning structure of paired reading. The benefits were perceived for both year groups, whether in the role of tutee or tutor."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.