Variable reciprocity assigns tutor roles for problems a student solved and tutee roles for problems not solved (as proposed by Evans and Moore)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r3 · q1
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? Under variable reciprocity, students act as tutors for problems they accurately solved and as tutees for problems they did not solve, ensuring tutors have solved the problem they tutor. → Chih-Yueh Chou & Tak-Wai Chan 2015

Evidence¶

Chih-Yueh Chou & Tak-Wai Chan 2015¶

Chih-Yueh Chou & Tak-Wai Chan. (2015). Reciprocal Tutoring: Design with Cognitive Load Sharing. International Artificial Intelligence in Education Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0083-7

q1 · i? · theoretical · r3

The commentary reports, citing Evans and Moore (2013), this role-assignment proposal within the OPAL system discussion; the article describes the proposal rather than presenting new data for it. Students who accurately solve a problem gain authority to be tutors for the problem.

"Evans and Moore (2013) proposed variable reciprocity in which students play the roles of tutor and tutee for various problems depending on whether or not they accurately solve the problems"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Peer Tutoring Improves Achievement — related
• Peer-assisted learning interventions improve achievement for elementary students — related
• Cross-age tutoring produces a small-to-moderate positive effect on academic outcomes for both tutors and tutees — related
• Sixth graders acting as peer tutors tended to take over problems and provide inaccurate feedback rather than help their tutee — related
• Teachers perceived lower ability students benefited most from the paired reading programme, in both tutor and tutee roles — related