Lowest-income schools show more variable growth than highest-income schools, with more schools both below the 50th and above the 82nd growth percentile¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2023: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Compared with schools where less than 10% of students are FRL-eligible, schools with more than 90% FRL have 15% more schools whose median growth is below the 50th percentile and 3% more whose growth is above the 82nd percentile. → Andy Hegedus 2018
Evidence¶
Andy Hegedus 2018¶
Andy Hegedus, Ed.D. (2018). Evaluating the Relationships between Poverty and School Performance. NWEA Research Report. https://www.nwea.org/research-data-galleries/poverty-and-school-performance
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Observational comparison of growth distributions for schools with %FRL less than 10% versus greater than 90% (Figure 2.3). The article reports the lowest income schools show more schools growing at both lower and higher median growth percentiles, with "15% more schools whose median student growth is below the 50th percentile and 3% more whose growth is above the 82nd percentile."
"The lowest income schools have 15% more schools whose median student growth is below the 50th percentile and 3% more whose growth is above the 82nd percentile."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- School poverty (%FRL) accounts for about 50% of a school's median student achievement — related
- School poverty is only weakly associated with median student growth in a school — related
- Sixty percent of the highest-poverty schools also have above-average student growth — related
- 77% of the lowest 5% achieving schools (spring reading) grow their typical student better than the 30th percentile — related
- High-poverty schools' high achievers had roughly even odds of above-average growth, and 75th-percentile growth would be needed to close the readiness gap — related
- Massachusetts students overall perform above the national average on screening assessments, with a median national percentile of 58 at EOY and 66 percent growing at average or above-average rates — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
lowest-income-schools-more-variable-growth |
title |
Lowest-income schools show more variable growth than highest-income schools, with more schools both below the 50th and above the 82nd growth percentile |
description |
Lowest-income schools show more variable growth than highest-income schools, with more schools both below the 50th and above the 82nd growth percentile |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
recheck_by |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — andy-hegedus-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.