In the Learner Variability Navigator case, feedback loops across multiple partners generated an output of need that the authors say simple surveys may not have produced¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? Engaging in feedback loops within a generator structure created synergistic effects that produced organically generated outputs supporting the LVP team's goals, and the authors suggest the outputs may have been significantly different had the team relied on simple survey responses. → lvn-case

Evidence¶

lvn-case¶

Baker, A., Weisgrau, J., & Brister Philyaw, K. (2022, May). Feedback loops: Mapping transformative interactions in education innovation. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/155

q1 · case study · i? · no effect size · design · r1

Case study analysis of the Learner Variability Navigator learner model refresh, mapped as a generator structure with the LVP team as central facilitator/designer in feedback loops with an advisor, educator consultants, and a practitioner advisory board. The authors' counterfactual interpretation, not a measured comparison.

"In this case, feedback loops served to push a programmatic goal forward by generating and utilizing knowledge across multiple partners and contexts to create an output of need. Had the LVP team chosen to rely on simple survey responses, the outputs may have been significantly different"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The authors argue formative feedback is critical for making student behaviour 'seen' in asynchronous online learning where the teacher is not physically present — related
• In the Maker Learning @ Home cohort, feedback loops with cohort members redefined the initiative's outputs and goals — related
• Engaging students as partners in analyzing and discussing student experience data creates authentic engagement and signals responsiveness to students — related