In the Maker Learning @ Home cohort, feedback loops with cohort members redefined the initiative's outputs and goals¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr1·q1
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Through a feedback loop with cohort members, the Digital Promise team shifted from project-specific guides to a field-wide project guide, and an additional output, a professional learning guide, emerged. → maker-case
Evidence¶
maker-case¶
Baker, A., Weisgrau, J., & Brister Philyaw, K. (2022, May). Feedback loops: Mapping transformative interactions in education innovation. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/155
q1 · case study · i? · no effect size · design · r1
Case study of the Maker Learning @ Home cohort, an amplifier structure in which six educators from four organizations took part in a six-month professional learning experience, and Digital Promise provided each organization $5,000 for its maker project; cohort members held user, designer, and translator roles. The realignment of goals is the authors' account of the loop in action.
"Through engaging in a feedback loop with cohort members, the Digital Promise team was able to reflect on and consider the direction of the project, as well as define a new output and goal–a project guide that was more widely applicable to the field."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The authors argue formative feedback is critical for making student behaviour 'seen' in asynchronous online learning where the teacher is not physically present — related
- In the Learner Variability Navigator case, feedback loops across multiple partners generated an output of need that the authors say simple surveys may not have produced — related
- Some initiatives fit no single generalized structure: the OER for Racial Justice project required a novel generator-plus-catalyzer combination — related
- AI-supported prototyping combined with educator feedback loops accelerated development and surfaced usability issues early in one K-2 literacy tool project — related
- Maker champions rank student project ideas and guides as the most needed resource, with online professional development least desired — related
- Student project ideas and guides remain the biggest identified resource need, while demand for professional development decreased — related
- Presenting prototypes to community partners created a sense of accountability among students that extended beyond grading — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
maker-cohort-amplifier-case |
title |
In the Maker Learning @ Home cohort, feedback loops with cohort members redefined the initiative's outputs and goals |
description |
In the Maker Learning @ Home cohort, feedback loops with cohort members redefined the initiative's outputs and goals |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by claude/unspecified on 2026-09-25 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — maker-case |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.