Claims

Frequent attenders of the live virtual physics classroom scored significantly higher than rare attenders in a distance physics course

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students who joined over 50% of live virtual physics lessons had significantly higher exam scores than students who joined below 50% (p=.006). → Ozgur Yilmaz 2015

Evidence

Ozgur Yilmaz 2015

Ozgur Yilmaz. (2015). THE EFFECTS OF "LIVE VIRTUAL CLASSROOM" ON STUDENTS' ACHIEVEMENT AND STUDENTS' OPINIONS ABOUT "LIVE VIRTUAL CLASSROOM" AT DISTANCE EDUCATION. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, volume 14 issue 1. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1057348

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Quasi-experimental comparison of 63 second-year distance students split into frequent (n=32) and rare (n=31) attenders of the live virtual physics classroom; midterm, final and make-up scores were compared. The frequent group mean was "significantly higher mean score (65,74)" versus 49,12, with t-test "p= ,006*".

"LVPCFF group had significantly higher mean score (65,74) than LVPCFR group’s mean score (49,12) during Live Virtual Physics Course and in dependent group t-test results showed that there was statistically significant difference between LVPCFF and LVPCFR groups’ scores (p= ,006*)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.