Performance-approach goals positively predict competitive regulation and performance-avoidance goals positively predict protective regulation overall (Studies 1 and 3)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr1·q3·i1–i2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Across Studies 1 and 3, performance-approach goals showed a main positive effect on self-reported competitive regulation. → Sommet 2015
q3 i1 In Study 3, performance-avoidance goals showed a main positive effect on self-reported protective regulation. → Sommet 2015 (2)
Evidence¶
Sommet 2015¶
Sommet, N., Darnon, C., & Butera, F. (2015). To Confirm or to Conform? Performance Goals as a Regulator of Conflict With More-Competent Others. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 580–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037240
q3 · i2 · associational · r?
Main effect in the Study 1 regression (139 university students, Internet paradigm). The printed effect was "β =.29, F(1, 129) =9.51, p <.003, ηp2 =.07"; a smaller main effect (β =.15, ηp2 =.02) also appeared in Study 3.
"The more participants endorsed performance-approach goals, the more they reported having regu- lated conflict in a competitive manner, /H9252/H11005.29, F(1, 129) /H110059.51, p /H11021.003, /H9257p2 /H11005.07."
Sommet 2015 (2)¶
Sommet, N., Darnon, C., & Butera, F. (2015). To Confirm or to Conform? Performance Goals as a Regulator of Conflict With More-Competent Others. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 580–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037240
q3 · i1 · associational · r1
Main effect in the Study 3 regression (289 university students). The printed effect was "β =.15, F(1, 277) =4.54, p <.04, ηp2 =.02".
"The more participants endorsed performance-avoidance goals, the more they reported having regulated conflict in a protective manner, /H9252/H11005.15, F(1, 277) /H110054.54, p /H11021.04, /H9257p2 /H11005.02."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Achievement Goal Orientation — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Performance goals regulate conflict with more-competent others toward competitive (approach) or protective (avoidance) interpersonal behavior — a broader claim this one bears on
- With explicit or unspecified superior partner competence, performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals predict competitive and protective regulation respectively (Study 3) — related
- Performance-approach goals predict competitive conflict regulation with a more-competent disagreeing partner, but not an equally competent one (Study 1) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
main-effects-performance-goals-conflict-regulation |
title |
Performance-approach goals positively predict competitive regulation and performance-avoidance goals positively predict protective regulation overall (Studies 1 and 3) |
description |
Performance-approach goals positively predict competitive regulation and performance-avoidance goals positively predict protective regulation overall (Studies 1 and 3) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — sommet-2015, sommet-2015-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.