Senior high school majors' background affects calculus conceptual understanding and self-efficacy, with no method-by-major interaction¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1–r2·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Majors' background significantly affected conceptual understanding, F(2,63)=5.77, p=.005, partial η2=.155, with natural science highest. → Ramadoni 2022
q2 i? Majors' background significantly affected self-efficacy, F(2,64)=4.63, p=.013, partial η2=.126, while the method effect was not significant (p=.080). → Ramadoni 2022 (2)
Evidence¶
Ramadoni 2022¶
Ramadoni, Mustofa (2022). Enhancing Flipped Classroom with Peer Teaching to Promote Students' Conceptual Understanding and Self-Efficacy in Calculus Courses. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, Vol. 12, No. 3, 154-168. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.03.17
q2 · i? · partial η² only, no d printed · causal · r2
Two-way ANCOVA (method × majors' background, controlling pretest) on conceptual understanding: majors' background significant, "F(2, 63)=5.77, p=.005, partial η2=.155"; natural science mean 79.02 vs social science 69.50 and vocational 74.64. Scheffe: natural science differed from social science (p=.001) and vocational (p=.010) only in PTFC.
"the data also shows that there was statistically significant majors' background with F(2, 63)=5.77, p=.005, partial η2=.155."
Ramadoni 2022 (2)¶
Ramadoni, Mustofa (2022). Enhancing Flipped Classroom with Peer Teaching to Promote Students' Conceptual Understanding and Self-Efficacy in Calculus Courses. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, Vol. 12, No. 3, 154-168. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.03.17
q2 · i? · partial η² only, no d printed · causal · r1
Two-way ANOVA on self-efficacy: majors' background significant, "F(2,64)=4.63, p=.013<.05, partial η2=.126"; method not significant, F(1,64)=3.17, p=.080, partial η2=.047. Scheffe showed natural science exceeded vocational (p=.014).
"The data show that the mean of majors' background is a significantly different with F(2,64)=4.63, p=.013<.05, partial η2=.126."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Prior achievement level affects calculus conceptual understanding, and PTFC outperforms CFC across achievement levels, with no interaction — related
- In one flipped calculus study, prior achievement level had no significant main effect on self-efficacy, although it interacted with teaching method — related
- In one flipped calculus study, teaching method (peer-teaching versus conventional flipped classroom) and prior achievement level interact on self-efficacy — related
- Peer-teaching flipped classroom students show higher calculus conceptual understanding than conventional flipped classroom students after controlling for pretest — related
- Self-efficacy, reflective thinking, and help-seeking were associated with topic understanding at the cohort level (r = 0.427, 0.369, 0.168; d = 0.479) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
majors-background-affects-outcomes |
title |
Senior high school majors' background affects calculus conceptual understanding and self-efficacy, with no method-by-major interaction |
description |
Senior high school majors' background affects calculus conceptual understanding and self-efficacy, with no method-by-major interaction |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — ramadoni-2022, ramadoni-2022-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.