Claims

Senior high school majors' background affects calculus conceptual understanding and self-efficacy, with no method-by-major interaction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1–r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Majors' background significantly affected conceptual understanding, F(2,63)=5.77, p=.005, partial η2=.155, with natural science highest. → Ramadoni 2022 q2 i? Majors' background significantly affected self-efficacy, F(2,64)=4.63, p=.013, partial η2=.126, while the method effect was not significant (p=.080). → Ramadoni 2022 (2)

Evidence

Ramadoni 2022

Ramadoni, Mustofa (2022). Enhancing Flipped Classroom with Peer Teaching to Promote Students' Conceptual Understanding and Self-Efficacy in Calculus Courses. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, Vol. 12, No. 3, 154-168. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.03.17

q2 · i? · partial η² only, no d printed · causal · r2

Two-way ANCOVA (method × majors' background, controlling pretest) on conceptual understanding: majors' background significant, "F(2, 63)=5.77, p=.005, partial η2=.155"; natural science mean 79.02 vs social science 69.50 and vocational 74.64. Scheffe: natural science differed from social science (p=.001) and vocational (p=.010) only in PTFC.

"the data also shows that there was statistically significant majors' background with F(2, 63)=5.77, p=.005, partial η2=.155."

Ramadoni 2022 (2)

Ramadoni, Mustofa (2022). Enhancing Flipped Classroom with Peer Teaching to Promote Students' Conceptual Understanding and Self-Efficacy in Calculus Courses. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, Vol. 12, No. 3, 154-168. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.03.17

q2 · i? · partial η² only, no d printed · causal · r1

Two-way ANOVA on self-efficacy: majors' background significant, "F(2,64)=4.63, p=.013<.05, partial η2=.126"; method not significant, F(1,64)=3.17, p=.080, partial η2=.047. Scheffe showed natural science exceeded vocational (p=.014).

"The data show that the mean of majors' background is a significantly different with F(2,64)=4.63, p=.013<.05, partial η2=.126."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id majors-background-affects-outcomes
title Senior high school majors' background affects calculus conceptual understanding and self-efficacy, with no method-by-major interaction
description Senior high school majors' background affects calculus conceptual understanding and self-efficacy, with no method-by-major interaction
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — ramadoni-2022, ramadoni-2022-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.