Prior achievement level affects calculus conceptual understanding, and PTFC outperforms CFC across achievement levels, with no interaction¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Prior achievement level significantly affected conceptual understanding, F(2,63)=4.20, p=.019, partial η2=.118; method also significant, F(1,63)=6.05, p=.017, partial η2=.088. → Ramadoni 2022
Evidence¶
Ramadoni 2022¶
Ramadoni, Mustofa (2022). Enhancing Flipped Classroom with Peer Teaching to Promote Students' Conceptual Understanding and Self-Efficacy in Calculus Courses. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, Vol. 12, No. 3, 154-168. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.03.17
q2 · i? · only partial eta squared is printed for this finding; no standardised mean difference · causal · r2
Two-way ANCOVA (method × prior achievement level, controlling pretest) on conceptual understanding: prior achievement significant, "F(2, 63)=4.20, p=.019, partial η2=.118"; method significant F(1,63)=6.05, p=.017, partial η2=.088; interaction not significant, F(2,63)=.99, p=.377. Scheffe: high differed from medium (p=.021) only in PTFC.
"the data also shows that there is a statistically significant prior achievement levelwith F(2, 63)=4.20, p=.019, partial η2=.118."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Prior Knowledge — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Prior Knowledge Determines New Learning — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Senior high school majors' background affects calculus conceptual understanding and self-efficacy, with no method-by-major interaction — related
- Peer-teaching flipped classroom students show higher calculus conceptual understanding than conventional flipped classroom students after controlling for pretest — related
- In one flipped calculus study, teaching method (peer-teaching versus conventional flipped classroom) and prior achievement level interact on self-efficacy — related
- In one flipped calculus study, prior achievement level had no significant main effect on self-efficacy, although it interacted with teaching method — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
prior-achievement-affects-conceptual-understanding |
title |
Prior achievement level affects calculus conceptual understanding, and PTFC outperforms CFC across achievement levels, with no interaction |
description |
Prior achievement level affects calculus conceptual understanding, and PTFC outperforms CFC across achievement levels, with no interaction |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — ramadoni-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.