The article reports a statistically significant difference between the make a match and control classes on the post-test t-test¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The article concludes H0 is rejected and H1 accepted, i.e. a significant difference between the experimental and control classes. → Arisanty 2019

Evidence¶

Arisanty 2019¶

Arisanty, D., Riyah. (2019). Application of make a match model to improve geography learning outcomes. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(1), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.547

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent-samples t-test on post-test scores of the two intact classes (df = 65). The article prints t = 1.465 and p = 0.074 and states "H0 is rejected, H1 is accepted, there is a significant difference"; no effect size is reported.

"The t-test line for equality is obtained t = 1.465, df = 65 and sig. (2 tailed) or p-value = 0.148/2 = 0.074 > 0.05 or H0 is rejected, H1 is accepted, there is a significant difference between the experimental class and the control class."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Class X students taught geography principles with the make a match model scored higher on the post-test than students taught with the conventional model — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)