Class X students taught geography principles with the make a match model scored higher on the post-test than students taught with the conventional model¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The experimental class post-test average (54.87) exceeded the control class post-test average (48.05), a difference of 6.82 points. → Arisanty 2019

Evidence¶

Arisanty 2019¶

Arisanty, D., Riyah. (2019). Application of make a match model to improve geography learning outcomes. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(1), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.547

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experiment with non-equivalent pre-test/post-test control group design: class X1 (n=35) used make a match, class X2 (n=32) used conventional teaching. The article reports "The average post-test score for the experimental class is 54.87" versus 48.05 for the control class.

"The average post-test score for the experimental class is 54.87. The average post-test score in control class is 48.05. The difference score between experiment class score and control class score is 6.82."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The article reports a statistically significant difference between the make a match and control classes on the post-test t-test — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• Class IX physical science students taught with the constructivist 7E model achieved significantly higher post-test and gain scores than students taught with traditional methods — related
• Junior secondary students taught algebraic expressions with card games and algebra tic-tacmatics achieved significantly higher adjusted post-test scores than students taught by conventional lecture method — related
• Ninth graders taught pre-vocational education with practical presentations had higher raw post-test means than peers taught by lecturing, but the pre-test-adjusted difference was reported at p = 0.053 — related
• Prior studies cited by the article also report that make a match improves student learning outcomes — related
• Experimental-class students scored higher on average (78 vs 70) on the science process skills test — related
• The experimental group's average achievement enhancement (28.14 points) exceeded the control group's (19.27 points) despite a lower pre-test mean — related
• Senior secondary Geography students taught with PowerPoint presentation scored significantly higher on post-test achievement than students taught with the lecture method — related