Male students in the group learning group significantly outperformed male students in the conventional group on the mathematics post-test¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Experimental male students scored significantly higher than conventional male students (46.68 vs 34.59). → Hossain 2012
Evidence¶
Hossain 2012¶
Hossain, M.A., & Tarmizi, R.A. (2012). Gender-related effects of group learning on mathematics achievement among the rural secondary students. Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 47, 1-22. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1057355
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Independent-sample t-test comparing male students across conditions (40 experimental, 43 control) after the 15-week treatment; pre-test means were equivalent (25.31 vs 24.36, not significant). The article reports the post-test difference favored "the male students in experimental group."
"the experimental male students scored post -test mean of 46.68 (SD = 2.79) which is higher than the conventional male students with post -test mean score of 34.59 (SD = 2.24). The difference between these two post -test means was significant t [(74.82) = 21.63, p < 0.05] in favor of the male students in experimental group"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Gender — moderator: an instructional effect differs by group
Related Claims¶
- Female students in the group learning group significantly outperformed female students in the conventional group on the mathematics post-test — related
- Within the group learning treatment, female students achieved significantly higher mathematics post-test scores than male students — related
- Group learning produced significantly higher mathematics achievement than conventional teaching among rural grade-nine students after a 15-week intervention — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.