Claims

Non-fraternity male freshmen were more likely than non-fraternity female freshmen to reach the laggard list

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 1910 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Among non-fraternity students, 10.4 per cent of men versus 6.2 per cent of women were on the laggard list. → J. B. Miner 1910

Evidence

J. B. Miner 1910

J. B. Miner. (1910). The College Laggard. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://www.google.com/search?q=%22The+College+Laggard%22+Miner+Journal+of+Educational+Psychology

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Statistical comparison of three years of freshman records at the University of Minnesota, comparing laggard-list percentages of non-fraternity men and women. The article reports "10.4 per cent" of 482 non-fraternity men versus 6.2 per cent of 675 non-fraternity women.

"Of the group of 482 non-fraternity men, 10.4 per cent, were on the laggard list, as compared with 6.2 per cent, of the group of 675 non-fraternity women."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id male-freshmen-more-laggards-than-female
title Non-fraternity male freshmen were more likely than non-fraternity female freshmen to reach the laggard list
description Non-fraternity male freshmen were more likely than non-fraternity female freshmen to reach the laggard list
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1910
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — j-b-miner-1910

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.