Claims

A Mann-Whitney U test also showed the game-based session's scores differed statistically from the traditional session's

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test confirmed that session A and session B score distributions differed statistically (midterm p = 0.0008; final p = 0.0168). → Huang and Hsu 2011

Evidence

Huang and Hsu 2011

Chin-Wen Huang, Chun-Pin Hsu. (2011). Using Online Games To Teach Personal Finance Concepts. American Journal of Business Education – December 2011 Volume 4, Number 12. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1056617

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Nonparametric robustness check reported in Section 4 alongside the t-tests for the same two-session comparison. Table 2 prints Mann-Whitney p-values of 0.0008 (midterm) and 0.0168 (final). No effect size is printed.

"The results of the Mann-Whitney U test also demonstrate that the data from session A were statistically different from those of session B."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.