Claims

Manual dexterity shows a significant positive very weak to weak association with mathematical skills, despite mixed findings

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i1 Correlational studies found significant very weak to weak positive correlations (r = 0.11–0.37) between manual dexterity and mathematical ability, but two high-school studies reported non-significant associations. → Macdonald Kirstin 2018

Evidence

Macdonald Kirstin 2018

Macdonald Kirstin, Milne Nikki, Orr Robin, Pope Rodney. (2018). Relationships between Motor Proficiency and Academic Performance in Mathematics and Reading in School-Aged Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081603

q3 · i1 · review · r3

Review synthesis of nine observational studies of manual dexterity and mathematics. Four correlation studies found "significant very weak to weak positive correlations (r = 0.11−0.37)"; five of six studies reporting significant associations were of fair to good quality.

"Summary coding suggests that despite mixed findings, overall there was sufficient evidence to support a significant positive very weak to weak association between manual dexterity and mathematical skills (see Table 1)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.