Test engagement was high across all grades on fall 2020 MAP Growth tests in both administration modes¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Students showed high test engagement on fall 2020 MAP Growth tests across all grades, whether tested remotely or in person. → Megan Kuhfeld 2020

Evidence¶

Megan Kuhfeld 2020¶

Megan Kuhfeld, Karyn Lewis, Patrick Meyer, Beth Tarasawa. (2020). Comparability analysis of remote and in-person MAP Growth testing in fall 2020. NWEA Research Technical Brief. https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/comparability-analysis-of-remote-and-in-person-map-growth-testing-in-fall-2020/

q2 · i? · associational · r2

The abstract reports "high levels of marginal reliability and test engagement across all grades" as an indicator of data quality for remotely administered tests.

"We found high levels of marginal reliability and test engagement across all grades, as well as consistent trends in test scores for remote and in-person tests for students in grades 3-8."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The assessment's engagement feature had a consistently positive impact under both in-person and remote proctoring — related
• The dashboard primarily focuses on grades 3 through 8 because remote and in-person MAP Growth results are largely comparable for grades 3 and up — related
• Findings of reliability, engagement, and consistent score trends increase confidence in the quality of remotely administered MAP Growth data in grades 3 and up — a broader claim this one bears on
• The grade-level disengagement pattern was not meaningfully different between remote and in-school testing — related
• Remote and in-person fall 2020 MAP Growth tests show comparable psychometric characteristics and indicators of test quality — a broader claim this one bears on
• Student test-taking disengagement on remotely administered adaptive interim assessments differs from disengagement on the same assessment administered in school — related
• In-person proctored nursing cohorts achieved significantly higher HESI scores and NCLEX readiness than remotely proctored (ProctorU) cohorts — related
• Fall 2020 MAP Growth tests showed high levels of marginal reliability across all grades in both remote and in-person administration — related
• Student disengagement on an adaptive interim assessment gradually increased across grade level — reports the opposite