Remote and in-person fall 2020 MAP Growth tests show comparable psychometric characteristics and indicators of test quality¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2023: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? MAP Growth tests administered remotely in fall 2020 showed psychometric characteristics and indicators of test quality comparable to those administered in person. → Megan Kuhfeld 2020
Evidence¶
Megan Kuhfeld 2020¶
Megan Kuhfeld, Karyn Lewis, Patrick Meyer, Beth Tarasawa. (2020). Comparability analysis of remote and in-person MAP Growth testing in fall 2020. NWEA Research Technical Brief. https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/comparability-analysis-of-remote-and-in-person-map-growth-testing-in-fall-2020/
q2 · i? · associational · r2
The brief's stated purpose is a comparability analysis of remote versus in-person fall 2020 MAP Growth administration, examining "psychometric characteristics and indicators of test quality" across the two modes.
"This study compared the psychometric characteristics and indicators of test quality of fall 2020 MAP Growth tests administered remotely and in-person."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The dashboard primarily focuses on grades 3 through 8 because remote and in-person MAP Growth results are largely comparable for grades 3 and up — related
- Fall 2020 MAP Growth tests showed high levels of marginal reliability across all grades in both remote and in-person administration — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Remote and in-person MAP Growth test scores showed consistent trends for students in grades 3-8 in fall 2020 — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Test engagement was high across all grades on fall 2020 MAP Growth tests in both administration modes — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Findings of reliability, engagement, and consistent score trends increase confidence in the quality of remotely administered MAP Growth data in grades 3 and up — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Student test-taking disengagement on remotely administered adaptive interim assessments differs from disengagement on the same assessment administered in school — related
- In-person proctored nursing cohorts achieved significantly higher HESI scores and NCLEX readiness than remotely proctored (ProctorU) cohorts — reports the opposite
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
remote-in-person-map-growth-comparability-fall-2020 |
title |
Remote and in-person fall 2020 MAP Growth tests show comparable psychometric characteristics and indicators of test quality |
description |
Remote and in-person fall 2020 MAP Growth tests show comparable psychometric characteristics and indicators of test quality |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
recheck_by |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — megan-kuhfeld-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.