Massed review at end of film produced significantly greater learning than no review or spaced review¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 1952 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Massed review at end of film produced significantly greater learning than no review or either spaced review condition. → Miller 1952

Evidence¶

Miller 1952¶

Miller, J., Levine, S., and Kanner, J. (1952). A Study of the Effects of Different Types of Review and of Structuring Sub-Titles on the Amount Learned from a Training Film. Memo Report No. 17, Human Resources Research Laboratories, Bolling Air Force Base. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED063741

q2 · i? · causal · r1

A 36-class, 1263-subject experiment compared four review treatments in training films on elementary electricity; the results section reports that massed review "produced significantly greater learning" than no review or the two spaced review conditions.

"(b) The conditions of massed review (at end of film) produced significantly greater learning than the condition of ttno review" or the two conditions of ttspaced review" used in the experiment."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Adaptive spaced retrieval practice produced higher end-of-semester posttest performance than learner-directed AI study, but fixed spaced retrieval did not significantly outperform learner-directed study — related
• Spaced Retrieval Improves Retention — reports the opposite
• Spaced retrieval practice outperformed both massed retrieval practice and no-practice control on delayed financial knowledge, while massed and control did not differ — reports the opposite
• Spacing out retrieval practice produces better long-term retention than massing it — reports the opposite
• Spaced quizzing increases end-of-semester retention of calculus learning objectives relative to massed quizzing — reports the opposite
• Spaced retrieval practice produces better final retention than massed retrieval even though spacing lowers initial retrieval success, and more absolute spacing enhances long-term retention — related
• End-of-semester recall of course material was better for relearning than for restudying — related
• LTP exhibits electrophysiological properties that make it an attractive candidate memory mechanism, including rapid induction, persistence up to at least a year, and greater persistence with spaced than massed induction protocols — related
• No-review, spaced review, and spaced oral review conditions yielded about the same mean post-film scores — related