Mastery learning is feasible for USG-PVC training without extra time, and overtraining beyond mastery criteria does not improve performance¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesisr2·q2·i0negligible
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Only three studies used mastery learning, requiring on average around 1 h of training, with about 30 min extra if the first assessment was not passed. → Jørgensen Rasmus 2021
q2 i0 Extra training after meeting mastery criteria did not increase success rate (overtraining). → Jørgensen Rasmus 2021 (2)
Evidence¶
Jørgensen Rasmus 2021¶
Jørgensen Rasmus, Laursen Christian B., Konge Lars, Pietersen Pia Iben. (2021). Education in the placement of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheters: a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00897-z
q2 · i? · review · r3
Review synthesis of the three mastery-learning studies [28, 30, 31]; the review reports mastery learning "did not take up more time, with an average around 1 h" versus non-mastery programs. No effect sizes printed.
"Compared to the studies that did not use mastery learning, mastery learning did not take up more time, with an average around 1 h, with approximate 30 min extra education time, if the first assessment was not passed [28, 30, 31]."
Jørgensen Rasmus 2021 (2)¶
Jørgensen Rasmus, Laursen Christian B., Konge Lars, Pietersen Pia Iben. (2021). Education in the placement of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheters: a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00897-z
q2 · i0 · quant-synthesis · r2
The review attributes to Kule et al. that "so called overtraining did not increase success rate" after mastery criteria were met; a null finding reported second-hand with no effect size.
"Additionally, Kule et al. showed that so called overtraining did not increase success rate [31]."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- A one-hour web-based e-learning program was equally efficient as a one-hour traditional classroom lecture for USG-PVC training — related
- Mastery Learning Improves Outcomes — a broader claim this one bears on
- Accumulated deliberate practice is associated with performance, explaining a domain-dependent share of its variance: about a quarter in games, 4% in education and under 1% in professions — related
- In eSpark quests requiring three post-quiz attempts, students reached the 80 percent mastery criterion only 14 percent of the time — related
- Nurses show a steep learning curve after initial USG-PVC training, reaching over 70% success probability after four to nine real-world attempts — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.