Claims

Math ability predicts neural maturity in the same brain regions for boys and girls, with no gender-by-ability interaction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? A whole-brain regression found math ability predicted neural maturity in IPS, prefrontal cortex, and middle temporal gyrus in both gender groups, and no cortical regions showed significant math-ability-by-gender interactions. → Kersey 2019

Evidence

Kersey 2019

Kersey, A. J., Csumitta, K. D., & Cantlon, J. F. (2019). Gender similarities in the brain during mathematics development. npj Science of Learning 4:19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-019-0057-x

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Whole-brain regression entering math ability, gender, and their interaction as predictors of neural maturity in the 104-child fMRI sample. Girls showed r(48) ≥ 0.36 and boys r(45) ≥ 0.37 relations between ability and maturity; the article concludes the relation does not depend on gender.

"No cortical regions showed significant interactions between math ability and gender (t(93) ≤ 2.63, threshold: voxel-wise p ≤ 0.01, cluster corrected to p < 0.05, threshold = 110 voxels), indicating that the relation between math ability and neural maturity does not depend on gender."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.