Claims

The Math Corps replication sites were successful in serving their priority communities

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The three replication sites succeeded in serving their priority communities as intended. → Barbara Harris 2021

Evidence

Barbara Harris 2021

Barbara Harris, Lindsay Fox. (2021). Math Corps Successfully Replicated. Mathematica. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/math-corps-successfully-replicated

q2 · i? · design · r2

The brief's key findings report that "The replication sites were successful in serving their priority communities," a descriptive conclusion from the independent Mathematica study of the NSF-funded replication; no supporting statistics are printed.

"The replication sites were successful in serving their priority communities."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id math-corps-replication-sites-served-priority-communities
title The Math Corps replication sites were successful in serving their priority communities
description The Math Corps replication sites were successful in serving their priority communities
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — barbara-harris-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.