Claims

Attendance at Math Corps was strong at all three replication sites

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2024: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Attendance at the Math Corps summer camp was strong across the Cleveland, Philadelphia, and Utica replication sites. → Barbara Harris 2021

Evidence

Barbara Harris 2021

Barbara Harris, Lindsay Fox. (2021). Math Corps Successfully Replicated. Mathematica. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/math-corps-successfully-replicated

q2 · i? · associational · r?

The brief's key findings state that "Attendance at Math Corps was strong at all three replication sites," based on the prospective descriptive study of the replication camps; no attendance figures or effect sizes are printed.

"Attendance at Math Corps was strong at all three replication sites."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id math-corps-strong-attendance-replication-sites
title Attendance at Math Corps was strong at all three replication sites
description Attendance at Math Corps was strong at all three replication sites
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2021
recheck_by 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — barbara-harris-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.