The learning benefit of mathematics test practice is larger for boys than for girls¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The effect of mathematics practice on subsequent math performance was significantly larger for boys (b = 4.12, SE = 1.41) than for girls (b = 0.34, SE = 1.11), with a formal test rejecting equal effects (p = 0.045). → Avvisati 2020
Evidence¶
Avvisati 2020¶
Avvisati, F., & Borgonovi, F. (2020). Learning Mathematics Problem Solving through Test Practice: a Randomized Field Experiment on a Global Scale. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 791–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09520-6
q3 · i? · causal · r3
Moderation analysis (model 8 in Table 4) in the same randomized field experiment (N = 19,355), interacting the continuous math-practice treatment with student sex. "significantly larger for boys" with the reported coefficients; the formal test of equal effects was rejected at p = 0.045.
"The observed learning effect of mathematics problem-solving practice was significantly larger for boys ( bboy = 4.12, SE boy = 1.41) than for girls, whose estimated effect is close to zero (bgirl =0 . 3 4 ,SEgirl = 1.11). A formal test rejected equal effects (bboy–bgirl =3 . 7 8 ,SE=1 . 8 9 ,p = 0.045)"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Gender — moderator: an instructional effect differs by group
Related Claims¶
- Across nations, boys outperform girls in mathematics by a small average margin while girls outperform boys in reading by a margin three times larger — a broader claim this one bears on
- The mathematics sex difference favoring boys is more consistently found among higher-achieving nations, with considerable variability among lower-scoring countries — related
- SAT scores underpredict the academic performance of high school girls, who average lower scores than boys despite higher grades — related
- Boys responded faster than girls on the test, but the response-time difference did not affect achievement — related
- Mathematics test practice does not improve domain-general problem-solving ability — related
- Mathematics anxiety does not moderate the effect of mathematics test practice on subsequent performance — related
- Boys outperform girls on algebra word problems, function mapping, equation memory, and arithmetic fluency, with no sex differences on other mathematics measures — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
math-practice-effect-larger-for-boys |
title |
The learning benefit of mathematics test practice is larger for boys than for girls |
description |
The learning benefit of mathematics test practice is larger for boys than for girls |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — avvisati-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.