Claims

Across nations, boys outperform girls in mathematics by a small average margin while girls outperform boys in reading by a margin three times larger

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 2 studies · 2 associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2018: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The mean overall sex difference in mathematics favoring boys was 10 to 11 points and remained relatively stable over ten years of PISA assessments. → Stoet G 2013 q3 i? The average sex difference in reading favoring girls was three times larger than the sex difference in mathematics. → Stoet G 2013 (2)

Evidence

Stoet G 2013

Stoet G, Geary DC (2013) Sex Differences in Mathematics and Reading Achievement Are Inversely Related: Within- and Across-Nation Assessment of 10 Years of PISA Data. PLoS ONE 8(3): e57988. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057988

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Secondary analysis of PISA 2000, 2003, 2006 and 2009 data from nearly 1.5 million 15-year-olds in 75 countries, with scores normalized so the OECD average is 500 points (SD 100). The printed average mathematics sex difference favoring boys was "10 to 11 points".

"Across nations, the mean overall sex difference in mathematics was small but remained relatively stable over the ten years at 10 to 11 points (Figure 1, top)."

Stoet G 2013 (2)

Stoet G, Geary DC (2013) Sex Differences in Mathematics and Reading Achievement Are Inversely Related: Within- and Across-Nation Assessment of 10 Years of PISA Data. PLoS ONE 8(3): e57988. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057988

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Same PISA secondary analysis, Results section. The article reports the average reading sex difference favoring girls was "three times larger" than the mathematics sex difference; no effect size beyond score points is printed.

"In contrast to the sex difference in mathematics, the difference in reading, favoring girls, receives relatively little attention, despite the fact that the average sex difference in reading was three times larger than the sex difference in mathematics (Figure 1, Table 2)."

Studies bearing on this claim

Do girls and boys differ in mathematics and reading achievement, by how much, and where in the distribution? This table gathers the studies behind this claim and the 15 narrower claims that bear on it: 8 distinct studies (5 associational, 1 causal, 1 design, 1 qualitative), q2–q3, 2 of 8 with an effect size coded. One row per study, codes as each entry records them; no effect is averaged and no verdict is drawn. Built by scripts/synthesize_claim.py from eval/synthesis/; a row that looks wrong is fixed on the claim it comes from.

Study Design Effect as recorded Bears on this claim through
Stoet G 2013 q3 · associational · r2 i?; i3 this claim; Sex differences in mathematics and reading are strongly and inversely correlated across na (supports); The inverse relation between mathematics and reading sex differences also holds within nat (supports); The reading sex difference favoring girls grew over the decade and was driven by very poor (supports); The mathematics sex difference is practically non-existent among low performers and larges (qualifies); The mathematics sex difference favoring boys is more consistently found among higher-achie (qualifies); National gender-equality and human-development indicators show no consistent correlation w (qualifies)
Kuhfeld 2019 q2 · associational · r2 i? Female kindergarteners outscore males in math and reading at entry; the reading gap was st (qualifies)
Megan Kuhfeld 2025 q2 · associational · r2 i? Boys regain the advantage in middle school STEM skills in post-COVID gender achievement ga (supports)
James Soland 2018 q2 / q3 · associational · r? i? Basic conclusions about male-female achievement gaps and changes in gaps as students progr (qualifies); Test effort differs substantially by student subgroup, with males rapidly guessing nearly (qualifies); Student test effort differs substantially across student gender and racial subgroups (qualifies)
Srdjan Verbić & Boris Tomić 2008 q2 · associational · r1 i? Boys responded faster than girls on the test, but the response-time difference did not aff (qualifies)
Zambo 1994 q2 · causal · r1 i0 No significant gender difference in word-problem performance on either formatted or unform (qualifies)
Shile Zhang and Shuhan Zhang 2026 q3 · design · r2 i? No significant gender differences in CTAT performance within either educational pathway (qualifies)
Saçkes 2015 q2 · qualitative · r3 i? Boys and girls do not differ in the type of mental models of the day and night cycle they (qualifies)

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id pisa-sex-differences-math-small-reading-three-times-larger
title Across nations, boys outperform girls in mathematics by a small average margin while girls outperform boys in reading by a margin three times larger
description Across nations, boys outperform girls in mathematics by a small average margin while girls outperform boys in reading by a margin three times larger
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2013
source_checked 2026-10-20
recheck_by 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — stoet-g-2013, stoet-g-2013-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.