Mathematical modelling produces a moderate positive effect on high school and college students' mathematics achievement compared with traditional instruction¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr1·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Across 13 primary studies with 1,670 participants, the overall mean effect size of mathematical modelling on student achievement was ES = 0.69 (SE = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.59–0.79), a medium positive effect. → Andrzej Sokolowski 2015
Evidence¶
Andrzej Sokolowski 2015¶
Andrzej Sokolowski. (2015). The Effects of Mathematical Modelling on Students’ Achievement-Meta-Analysis of Research. The IAFOR Journal of Education, Volume III - Issue I - Winter 2015. https://journals.iafor.org/index.php/joe
q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r1
Meta-analysis of 13 peer-reviewed experimental studies (1,670 participants) published 2000–2013, comparing modelling-based instruction with traditional methods using Hedges' formula. The article reports "ES = 0.69 (SE = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.59–0.79)" of medium magnitude and positive direction.
"The overall mean effect size; ES = 0.69 (SE = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.59–0.79) of a medium magnitude and positive direction supported the claim that mathematical modelling helps students understand and apply math concepts."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Cooperative learning produces a medium, positive, significant effect on mathematics achievement compared with traditional methods (d++ = 0.59) — related
- Student-centred strategies, methods and techniques produce a moderate-to-high overall effect on primary school students' mathematics achievement compared to traditional teaching (ES = 0.787, random-effects model) — related
- AI-supported instruction has a moderate positive effect on student achievement in STEM education (g = 0.670 under a random effects model) — related
- AI-enabled personalized STEM education yields a statistically significant overall effect of g = 0.455, which its authors class as small, compared with traditional non-AI instruction in K-12 schools — related
- Learning with intelligent tutoring systems yields a moderate, statistically significant overall advantage in achievement over non-ITS modes of instruction — related
- STEM educational practices have a moderate positive effect on students' academic achievement compared with traditional teaching (REM ES = 0.442) — related
- High school students show a larger achievement effect from mathematical modelling than college students — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Context-based learning has a statistically significant positive overall effect on academic achievement (g=0.970) compared to traditional lecture-based instruction — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.