Claims

Mathematical modelling produces a moderate positive effect on high school and college students' mathematics achievement compared with traditional instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Across 13 primary studies with 1,670 participants, the overall mean effect size of mathematical modelling on student achievement was ES = 0.69 (SE = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.59–0.79), a medium positive effect. → Andrzej Sokolowski 2015

Evidence

Andrzej Sokolowski 2015

Andrzej Sokolowski. (2015). The Effects of Mathematical Modelling on Students’ Achievement-Meta-Analysis of Research. The IAFOR Journal of Education, Volume III - Issue I - Winter 2015. https://journals.iafor.org/index.php/joe

q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r1

Meta-analysis of 13 peer-reviewed experimental studies (1,670 participants) published 2000–2013, comparing modelling-based instruction with traditional methods using Hedges' formula. The article reports "ES = 0.69 (SE = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.59–0.79)" of medium magnitude and positive direction.

"The overall mean effect size; ES = 0.69 (SE = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.59–0.79) of a medium magnitude and positive direction supported the claim that mathematical modelling helps students understand and apply math concepts."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.