High school students show a larger achievement effect from mathematical modelling than college students¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 The moderator analysis found high school students gained ES = 0.94 (SE = 0.07) versus college students' ES = 0.45 (SE = 0.08). → Andrzej Sokolowski 2015
Evidence¶
Andrzej Sokolowski 2015¶
Andrzej Sokolowski. (2015). The Effects of Mathematical Modelling on Students’ Achievement-Meta-Analysis of Research. The IAFOR Journal of Education, Volume III - Issue I - Winter 2015. https://journals.iafor.org/index.php/joe
q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r2
Subgroup moderator analysis of the 13-study pool, weighted per Cooper (2009), comparing seven high school and seven college studies. The article reports "ES = 0.94 (SE = 0.07)" for high school versus "ES = 0.45 (SE = 0.08)" for college.
"The effect size showed differences; high school students reported a large effect size of ES = 0.94 (SE = 0.07), versus college-level reporting a moderate effect size of ES = 0.45 (SE = 0.08)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Mathematical modelling produces a moderate positive effect on high school and college students' mathematics achievement compared with traditional instruction — a broader claim this one bears on
- Shorter modelling treatments produce larger achievement effects than semester-length treatments — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.