The authors interpret the null between-group result as reflecting the program's short duration and students' lack of experience with critical thinking tasks¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q1
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? The authors propose that the 16-hour program was not long enough for students to improve their critical thinking skills, helping explain why the targeted skill was not developed relative to controls. → Bati 2015
Evidence¶
Bati 2015¶
Bati, K. & Kaptan, F. (2015). The Effect of Modeling Based Science Education on Critical Thinking. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 10(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1127622
q1 · i? · causal · r1
Authors' interpretive discussion of the null ANCOVA result, offered without new data. They also note that participating teachers agreed critical thinking is not easily attainable and that students are not sufficiently present at settings where they can improve such skills.
"In addition to these, considering that the program developed for the study was not long enough for the students to enable them to improve their critical thinking skills, it can be understood why this targeted skill was not developed."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Critical Thinking — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- The authors judge insufficient instructional intensity (dosage) as the primary factor behind the null result of learning strategies instruction in adult education — related
- The authors argue the two-week experiment was too short for participants to acquire SQL skills, explaining the blended group's lower performance — related
- Effect size of creative drama on skills varies significantly with duration of experimental application, with longer applications showing larger effects — related
- The authors interpret the weaker individual-level effects as possibly due to the informative-only format, short duration, and highly educated sample — related
- The one-week, one-time training duration was too short to produce statistically significant change in conflict handling styles — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.