Determining the right M&E activities for a new or evolving solution is challenging, and more complex when investing in multiple solutions at once¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoreticalr1·q1
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? When investing in a new or evolving program, product, or practice, it is challenging to determine the right M&E activities to uncover whether a solution works, for whom, and in what context, and this challenge is more complex when investing in multiple solutions at the same time. → Kara Conroy 2023
Evidence¶
Kara Conroy 2023¶
Kara Conroy, Kate Place, Greg Chojnacki. (2023). Maximizing Learning Across Investments: Recommendations for Funders. Mathematica. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/maximizing-learning-across-investments-recommendations-for-funders
q1 · i? · theoretical · r1
The brief's framing statement, offered as expert guidance rather than an empirical test; it reports no data or effect sizes. It identifies the core problem the recommendations address: choosing "the right measurement and evaluation (M&E) activities" for a solution.
"When investing in a new or evolving program, product, or practice (a solution), it can be challenging to determine the right measurement and evaluation (M&E) activities that will uncover whether a solution works, for whom, and in what context."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Progress in evidence-based solution development is not always linear; evidence determines phase movement — related
- Common gaps in the SSI Youth Solutions proposal papers concern effects on employment outcomes, costs, and implementation challenges — related
- The M&E Plan Template promotes continuity across funders' portfolios, enabling streamlined review and cross-solution comparisons — related
- Rapid-cycle evaluation determines with high confidence whether and for whom a program change causes intended improvements or unintended consequences — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- For classroom assessments of complex constructs such as learning progressions in math and science, test score use is more effectively conceptualized as part of a potential solution to a problem, or 'job-to-be-done' — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Operation Warp Speed illustrates that purpose-built agile R&D structures can compress time-to-impact during systemic disruption — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
me-selection-challenging-multi-solution-investments |
title |
Determining the right M&E activities for a new or evolving solution is challenging, and more complex when investing in multiple solutions at once |
description |
Determining the right M&E activities for a new or evolving solution is challenging, and more complex when investing in multiple solutions at once |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — kara-conroy-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.