School meditation programmes foster small improvements in well-being, more consistently reducing negative outcomes than promoting positive ones¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr3·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-10-23 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Meditation programmes show small improvements in student well-being, with benefits more consistent for reducing negative states (anxiety, stress, negative affect) than for promoting positive states. → Lea Waters 2015
q3 i3 In Mendelson et al.'s RCT, mood was unaffected but meditating students scored significantly lower on involuntary stress responses (e.g. involuntary engagement d=.83, rumination d=.70). → Lea Waters 2015 (2)
Evidence¶
Lea Waters 2015¶
Lea Waters, Adam Barsky, Amanda Ridd, Kelly Allen. (2015). Contemplative Education: A Systematic, Evidence-Based Review of the effect of Meditation Interventions in Schools. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9258-2
q3 · i? · review · r3
The review's synthesis of nine studies (n=1,483) on well-being, providing 17 results of which 59% were significant, with Cohen's d ranging from 0.02 to 0.62. The review concludes "The benefits are more consistent for reducing negative rather than promoting positive outcomes."
"The overall profile suggests that meditation fosters small improvements in well-being. The benefits are more consistent for reducing negative rather than promoting positive outcomes."
Lea Waters 2015 (2)¶
Lea Waters, Adam Barsky, Amanda Ridd, Kelly Allen. (2015). Contemplative Education: A Systematic, Evidence-Based Review of the effect of Meditation Interventions in Schools. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9258-2
q3 · i3 · review · r3
This systematic review summarises one of its included studies, Mendelson et al. (2010), a randomised controlled trial of 12 weeks of mindfulness meditation in fourth and fifth graders (intervention=51, control=46); Waters et al. did not run the trial themselves. The review reports no differences in positive or negative affect, but significant reductions in stress responses with printed effect sizes, e.g. "involuntary engagement (d=.83)" and rumination d=.70.
"at post-test, students who underwent the intervention scored significantly lower on emotional arousal ( d=.64), intrusive thoughts (d=.51), involuntary engagement (d=.83) and rumination ( d=.70), suggesting that while mood was unaffected, general stress and coping responses were improved."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Evidence on meditation and academic achievement is scant: only three published studies, with the strongest from TM programmes on standardised test scores — related
- School meditation studies show significant improvements in emotional regulation, including reduced involuntary stress responses and behavioural dysregulation — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Meditation shows significant but predominantly small effects on social competence, with teacher-facilitated programmes showing more significant effects — related
- Across all RCTs, mindfulness-based interventions significantly improve mindfulness, executive functioning, attention, depression, anxiety/stress and negative behaviours in youth, with small effect sizes — related
- A practice brief reviewing self-regulation interventions reports substantial benefits of mindfulness programs for cognitive and emotional regulation, stress and mental health in adolescents and young adults — related
- Mindfulness and meditation interventions supported teacher well-being in 10 of 12 studies, with two studies showing non-significant changes — related
- Transcendental meditation programmes showed a higher percentage of significant well-being effects than mindfulness-based and other meditation types, possibly due to settings and delivery — related
- Mindfulness interventions delivered during late adolescence (15–18) show the largest effects on youth mental health and well-being outcomes — related
- Mindfulness interventions consisting of combinations of various mindfulness activities show the largest effects on youth mental health and well-being — related
- Studies of emotional training of aspiring and practicing teachers report positive outcomes for dealing with emotions and reducing stress and burnout — related
- Mindfulness interventions in schools show the largest between-group effects for cognitive performance (g = 0.80) and smaller significant effects for stress (g = 0.39) and resilience (g = 0.36) — related
- School meditation studies show significant improvements on several cognitive functioning measures, though effects vary by measure and study — related
- School-based mindfulness interventions produce small-to-moderate significant pre-post improvements in youth mental health and well-being compared to control groups — related
- Some social-emotional and cognitive-behavioural initiatives showed no effect or a negative effect on educator wellbeing — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
meditation-small-wellbeing-gains-negative-outcomes |
title |
School meditation programmes foster small improvements in well-being, more consistently reducing negative outcomes than promoting positive ones |
description |
School meditation programmes foster small improvements in well-being, more consistently reducing negative outcomes than promoting positive ones |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
source_checked |
2026-10-23 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — lea-waters-2015, lea-waters-2015-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.