Claims

School meditation programmes foster small improvements in well-being, more consistently reducing negative outcomes than promoting positive ones

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r3 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-10-23 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Meditation programmes show small improvements in student well-being, with benefits more consistent for reducing negative states (anxiety, stress, negative affect) than for promoting positive states. → Lea Waters 2015 q3 i3 In Mendelson et al.'s RCT, mood was unaffected but meditating students scored significantly lower on involuntary stress responses (e.g. involuntary engagement d=.83, rumination d=.70). → Lea Waters 2015 (2)

Evidence

Lea Waters 2015

Lea Waters, Adam Barsky, Amanda Ridd, Kelly Allen. (2015). Contemplative Education: A Systematic, Evidence-Based Review of the effect of Meditation Interventions in Schools. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9258-2

q3 · i? · review · r3

The review's synthesis of nine studies (n=1,483) on well-being, providing 17 results of which 59% were significant, with Cohen's d ranging from 0.02 to 0.62. The review concludes "The benefits are more consistent for reducing negative rather than promoting positive outcomes."

"The overall profile suggests that meditation fosters small improvements in well-being. The benefits are more consistent for reducing negative rather than promoting positive outcomes."

Lea Waters 2015 (2)

Lea Waters, Adam Barsky, Amanda Ridd, Kelly Allen. (2015). Contemplative Education: A Systematic, Evidence-Based Review of the effect of Meditation Interventions in Schools. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9258-2

q3 · i3 · review · r3

This systematic review summarises one of its included studies, Mendelson et al. (2010), a randomised controlled trial of 12 weeks of mindfulness meditation in fourth and fifth graders (intervention=51, control=46); Waters et al. did not run the trial themselves. The review reports no differences in positive or negative affect, but significant reductions in stress responses with printed effect sizes, e.g. "involuntary engagement (d=.83)" and rumination d=.70.

"at post-test, students who underwent the intervention scored significantly lower on emotional arousal ( d=.64), intrusive thoughts (d=.51), involuntary engagement (d=.83) and rumination ( d=.70), suggesting that while mood was unaffected, general stress and coping responses were improved."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id meditation-small-wellbeing-gains-negative-outcomes
title School meditation programmes foster small improvements in well-being, more consistently reducing negative outcomes than promoting positive ones
description School meditation programmes foster small improvements in well-being, more consistently reducing negative outcomes than promoting positive ones
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2015
source_checked 2026-10-23
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — lea-waters-2015, lea-waters-2015-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.