Some social-emotional and cognitive-behavioural initiatives showed no effect or a negative effect on educator wellbeing¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? EI in the Classroom showed no effect on stress, anxiety, teacher efficacy, life satisfaction or resiliency in pre-service educators. → Emily Berger 2022
q2 i? DBT-ST appeared to have a negative effect on teachers' wellbeing. → Emily Berger 2022 (2)
Evidence¶
Emily Berger 2022¶
Emily Berger, Andrea Reupert, Timothy C. H. Campbell, Zoe Morris, Marie Hammer, Zane Diamond, Rochelle Hine, Pamela Patrick, Chantel Fathers. (2022). A Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Wellbeing Initiatives for Schoolteachers and Early Childhood Educators. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09690-5
q2 · i? · causal · r?
Vesely et al.'s evaluation of the adapted Emotional Intelligence in the Classroom initiative with 49 undergraduate teacher candidates, as summarised in the review's Table 4: "The initiative did not have an effect on stress, anxiety, teacher efficacy, sat- isfaction with life, or resiliency".
"The initiative did not have an effect on stress, anxiety, teacher efficacy, sat- isfaction with life, or resiliency"
Emily Berger 2022 (2)¶
Emily Berger, Andrea Reupert, Timothy C. H. Campbell, Zoe Morris, Marie Hammer, Zane Diamond, Rochelle Hine, Pamela Patrick, Chantel Fathers. (2022). A Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Wellbeing Initiatives for Schoolteachers and Early Childhood Educators. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09690-5
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Justo et al.'s evaluation of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy—Skills Training with 27 teachers in Brazilian public primary schools, as summarised in the review: "The initiative appeared to have a negative effect on teachers' wellbeing", with difficulty acting according to goals under negative emotion increasing during the initiative.
"The initiative appeared to have a negative effect on teachers' wellbeing"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- No educator wellbeing initiative has been evaluated in multiple RCTs, so Level I evidence is unavailable — related
- Studies of emotional training of aspiring and practicing teachers report positive outcomes for dealing with emotions and reducing stress and burnout — reports the opposite
- School meditation programmes foster small improvements in well-being, more consistently reducing negative outcomes than promoting positive ones — related
- A practice brief reviewing self-regulation interventions reports substantial benefits of mindfulness programs for cognitive and emotional regulation, stress and mental health in adolescents and young adults — related
- Across all RCTs, mindfulness-based interventions significantly improve mindfulness, executive functioning, attention, depression, anxiety/stress and negative behaviours in youth, with small effect sizes — related
- Mindfulness interventions in schools show the largest between-group effects for cognitive performance (g = 0.80) and smaller significant effects for stress (g = 0.39) and resilience (g = 0.36) — related
- Interventions with high schoolers and young adults show strong consistent improvement in cognitive regulation and small but significant improvements in health, mental health, and delinquency — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
some-initiatives-no-or-negative-effect |
title |
Some social-emotional and cognitive-behavioural initiatives showed no effect or a negative effect on educator wellbeing |
description |
Some social-emotional and cognitive-behavioural initiatives showed no effect or a negative effect on educator wellbeing |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
mixed |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — emily-berger-2022, emily-berger-2022-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.