Claims

Medium positive correlation between SHOM and argumentation skill levels

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Design limits · Çakiroğlu 2025: no comparison group (read from the study by two models, 2026-10-28)

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 SHOM post-test scores correlate positively with final argumentation scores, r = 0.462. → Çakiroğlu 2025

Evidence

Çakiroğlu 2025

Çakiroğlu, Ü., Güven, O., Yaman, H., & Mazlum Güven, E. (2025). Scientific habits of arguing minds: enhancing online argumentation to foster SHOM. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10474-1

q2 · i3 · causal · r1

Pearson product-moment correlation between SHOM Survey post-test scores and final argumentation rubric scores for 33 teacher candidates, after checking normality, linearity and homoscedasticity assumptions; r = 0.462, a medium positive correlation.

"There was a medium, positive correlation between the two variables (r = 0.462, n = 33, p < 0.005) with high levels of SHOM associated with higher levels of argumentation skills."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id medium-positive-correlation-shom-argumentation
title Medium positive correlation between SHOM and argumentation skill levels
description Medium positive correlation between SHOM and argumentation skill levels
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — çakiroğlu-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.