Claims

Suspension of belief was the only SHOM dimension enhanced by the argumentation process

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Suspension of belief scores increased after implementation, though not statistically significant. → Çakiroğlu 2025

Evidence

Çakiroğlu 2025

Çakiroğlu, Ü., Güven, O., Yaman, H., & Mazlum Güven, E. (2025). Scientific habits of arguing minds: enhancing online argumentation to foster SHOM. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10474-1

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Paired t-test results on SHOM Survey subscales; suspension of belief and open-mindedness increased but not significantly. Authors argue the dissenting-opinion videos and rebuttal writing fostered abeyance of belief.

"The suspension of belief and open mindedness habits of mind increased after the implementation, but those increases were not statistically significant."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id suspension-of-belief-enhanced
title Suspension of belief was the only SHOM dimension enhanced by the argumentation process
description Suspension of belief was the only SHOM dimension enhanced by the argumentation process
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — çakiroğlu-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.