Claims

A two-hour single intervention on Medline searching led intervention students to have fewer search errors and higher quality searches than control students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Intervention students had fewer search errors and correspondingly higher quality searches than did the control students after a two-hour single intervention on Medline searching techniques. → Kyriakoulis Konstantinos 2016

Evidence

Kyriakoulis Konstantinos 2016

Kyriakoulis Konstantinos, Patelarou Athina, Laliotis Aggelos, Wan Andrew C, Matalliotakis Michail, Tsiou Chrysoula, Patelarou Evridiki. (2016). Educational strategies for teaching evidence-based practice to undergraduate health students: systematic review. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066070/

q3 · i? · review · r2

Controlled comparison study of a two-hour single intervention on Medline searching for evidence related to a clinical problem, in 4th-year medical students (n=92). The review reports "the intervention students had fewer search errors and correspondingly higher quality searches than did the control students".

"Findings showed that the intervention students had fewer search errors and correspondingly higher quality searches than did the control students."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.