A two-hour single intervention on Medline searching led intervention students to have fewer search errors and higher quality searches than control students¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Intervention students had fewer search errors and correspondingly higher quality searches than did the control students after a two-hour single intervention on Medline searching techniques. → Kyriakoulis Konstantinos 2016
Evidence¶
Kyriakoulis Konstantinos 2016¶
Kyriakoulis Konstantinos, Patelarou Athina, Laliotis Aggelos, Wan Andrew C, Matalliotakis Michail, Tsiou Chrysoula, Patelarou Evridiki. (2016). Educational strategies for teaching evidence-based practice to undergraduate health students: systematic review. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066070/
q3 · i? · review · r2
Controlled comparison study of a two-hour single intervention on Medline searching for evidence related to a clinical problem, in 4th-year medical students (n=92). The review reports "the intervention students had fewer search errors and correspondingly higher quality searches than did the control students".
"Findings showed that the intervention students had fewer search errors and correspondingly higher quality searches than did the control students."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- A single two-hour EBM literature searching workshop did not significantly improve medical students' overall EBM literature searching skills at one week (10.51 vs. 10.50, P=0.99) — related
- Medical students who received multifaceted EBM training and searched PubMed or Medline more than three times per week increased from 9.7% to 31.7% (P<0.001) — related
- In a randomized crossover trial, PICO searching yielded higher average sensitivity and lower average precision than unguided searching, not statistically significant — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.