Claims

Menstrual cycle phase did not significantly moderate stress effects on cognitive flexibility

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? There was no significant moderating effect of menstrual cycle phase on cognitive flexibility. → Shields Grant S. 2016

Evidence

Shields Grant S. 2016

Shields Grant S., Trainor Brian C., Lam Jovian C. W., Yonelinas Andrew P. (2016). Acute Stress Impairs Cognitive Flexibility in Men, Not Women. Stress. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253890.2016.1192603

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Additional analysis within the randomized experiment testing menstrual cycle phase (approximated from days since cycle onset) as a moderator. The article reports only the F statistic and "p=.167".

"An additional analysis determined that there was no significant moderating effect of menstrual cycle phase on cognitive flexibility, F(2,60)=1.85, p=.167."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id menstrual-phase-no-moderation-flexibility
title Menstrual cycle phase did not significantly moderate stress effects on cognitive flexibility
description Menstrual cycle phase did not significantly moderate stress effects on cognitive flexibility
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — shields-grant-s-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.