Claims

Frequent private-message writers show a lower note scan rate, scanning fewer opened notes (r = −.18)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i1 Number of synchronous messages written correlates negatively with note scan rate while reading others' notes (r = −0.18, p = 0.007). → Murat Oztok 2012

Evidence

Murat Oztok 2012

Murat Oztok, Daniel Zingaro, Clare Brett, Jim Hewitt. (2012). Exploring Asynchronous and Synchronous Tool use in Online Courses. Preprint submitted to Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.007

q2 · i1 · associational · r1

Correlational log analysis over all 222 students in the nine courses, using the scan-rate metric defined as reading at eight words-per-second or more. The quote reports "r = −0.18,p = 0.007", so heavier message writers scan less.

"In considering scan rate, we find a significant negative correlation between number of messages written and scan rate while reading other students’ notes ( r = −0.18,p = 0.007)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.