Claims

Students in large online classes scan lengthy notes (over 350 words) more frequently than students in small classes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Mean scanning rates differed significantly between small classes (n=77) and large classes (n=168) for notes containing more than 350 words (p<0.05), but not for shorter notes. → Hewitt 2007

Evidence

Hewitt 2007

Hewitt, J., & Brett, C. (2007). The relationship between class size and online activity patterns in asynchronous computer conferencing environments. Computers & Education, 49, 1258-1271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.02.001

q3 · i? · associational · r1

Independent samples t-test comparing scanning rates (reading speeds of 8.0 wps or faster, computed from time-stamped log data) between the 10 largest and 10 smallest of the 28 courses. The article reports significant differences (p<0.05) only for notes over 350 words; no significant differences were found for shorter notes.

"An independent samples t-test found statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the mean scanning rates of students in small classes (n=77) and those in large classes (n=168) for notes containing more than 350 words. No significant differences in scanning rates were found between small classes and large classes for notes containing fewer than 350 words."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.