Claims

Metacognition is significantly and positively related to EFL students' academic writing performance (Model 1)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · checked against its sources 2026-10-19 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Metacognition was significantly and positively related to EFL students' academic writing after considering measurement error, with a normalized path coefficient of 0.885. → Mark Feng Teng 2022

Evidence

Mark Feng Teng 2022

Mark Feng Teng, Mei Yue. (2022). Metacognitive writing strategies, critical thinking skills, and academic writing performance: A structural equation modeling approach. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09328-5

q3 · i? · associational · r2

SEM Model 1 tested metacognition (eight MAWSQ factors) against academic writing in a sample of third-year Chinese university EFL students. The model fit well (χ2/df = 2.355, RMSEA = 0.065, CFI = 0.917), and the "normalized path coefficient value was 0.885" (z = 7.494, p < 0.001).

"In terms of the relationship between metacognition and academic writing, the normalized path coefficient value was 0.885 at a significance level of 0.01 (z = 7.494, p < 0.001). Accordingly, metacognition was significantly and positively related to EFL students' academic writing after considering measurement error."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id metacognition-positively-related-efl-academic-writing
title Metacognition is significantly and positively related to EFL students' academic writing performance (Model 1)
description Metacognition is significantly and positively related to EFL students' academic writing performance (Model 1)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
source_checked 2026-10-19
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — mark-feng-teng-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.