Claims

Metacognition is significantly and positively associated with EFL students' critical thinking skills (Model 2)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · checked against its sources 2026-10-19 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Metacognition was significantly and positively associated with EFL students' critical thinking skills, with a normalized path coefficient of 0.870. → Mark Feng Teng 2022

Evidence

Mark Feng Teng 2022

Mark Feng Teng, Mei Yue. (2022). Metacognitive writing strategies, critical thinking skills, and academic writing performance: A structural equation modeling approach. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09328-5

q3 · i? · associational · r2

SEM Model 2 tested metacognition against the five W-GCTA critical thinking subtests in the same university EFL sample. The model fit the data well (χ2/df = 2.355, RMSEA = 0.065), and the path coefficient was 0.870 (z = 7.193, p < 0.001).

"The association between metacognition and critical thinking showed a normalized path coefficient of 0.870, which was statistically significant at the 0.001 level (z = 7.193, p < 0.001). Metacognition was therefore significantly and positively associated with EFL students' critical thinking skills with consideration of error measurement."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id metacognition-positively-associated-critical-thinking
title Metacognition is significantly and positively associated with EFL students' critical thinking skills (Model 2)
description Metacognition is significantly and positively associated with EFL students' critical thinking skills (Model 2)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
source_checked 2026-10-19
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — mark-feng-teng-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.