Claims

In one preregistered experiment, metacognitive feedback on learners' own LLM use lowered the odds of answer offloading and raised the odds of a correct unaided answer on one-sided tests, with 95% intervals reaching no effect

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-15 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Participants who received metacognitive feedback had lower odds of answer offloading than those who did not (OR = 0.47). → Sebastian Maier 2026 q3 i? Participants who received metacognitive feedback had higher odds of answering a subsequent unaided test item correctly (OR = 1.51). → Sebastian Maier 2026 (2)

Evidence

Sebastian Maier 2026

Sebastian Maier, Kai Schwabe, Manuel Schneider, and Stefan Feuerriegel. (2026). Designing Against Deskilling: Metacognitive Feedback Reduces Cognitive Offloading to LLM Assistants. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20143 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.20143

q3 · i? · causal · r3

Confirmatory item-level mixed-effects logistic regression (H2a) in the preregistered online experiment, testing the metacognitive feedback main effect on offloading across nine learning items. The article reports "lower odds of answer offloading" with OR = 0.47, 95% CI [0.22, 1.00], p = .026, one-sided.

"participants who received metacognitive feedback had lower odds of answer offloading than those who did not (𝑏=− 0.75,𝑆𝐸= 0.39,𝑂𝑅= 0.47, 95% CI[0.22, 1.00],𝑧=− 1.95,𝑝=. 026)"

Sebastian Maier 2026 (2)

Sebastian Maier, Kai Schwabe, Manuel Schneider, and Stefan Feuerriegel. (2026). Designing Against Deskilling: Metacognitive Feedback Reduces Cognitive Offloading to LLM Assistants. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20143

q3 · i? · causal · r3

Confirmatory test of H2b on the six-item unaided final test in the same preregistered experiment. The article reports "higher odds of answering a subsequent unaided test item correctly" with OR = 1.51, 95% CI [0.98, 2.33], p = .030; the CI includes 1.0.

"they had higher odds of answering a subsequent unaided test item correctly (𝑏= 0.42,𝑆𝐸= 0.22,𝑂𝑅= 1.51, 95% CI[0.98, 2.33],𝑧= 1.88,𝑝=. 030)"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id metacognitive-feedback-reduces-llm-answer-offloading-improves-unaided-performance
title In one preregistered experiment, metacognitive feedback on learners' own LLM use lowered the odds of answer offloading and raised the odds of a correct unaided answer on one-sided tests, with 95% intervals reaching no effect
description In one preregistered experiment, metacognitive feedback on learners' own LLM use lowered the odds of answer offloading and raised the odds of a correct unaided answer on one-sided tests, with 95% intervals reaching no effect
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
source_checked 2026-10-15
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — sebastian-maier-2026, sebastian-maier-2026-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.