Claims

In Experiment 1, metacognitive preference for interleaving showed main effects of utility value and differences-matter instruction without an interaction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Ordinal regression showed a significant impact of utility value on preference for interleaving. → Roman Abel 2024 q3 i? Ordinal regression showed a significant impact of differences-matter instruction on preference for interleaving, with no interaction between the factors. → Roman Abel 2024 (2)

Evidence

Roman Abel 2024

Roman Abel, Anique de Bruin, Erdem Onan, Julian Roelle. (2024). Why Do Learners (Under)Utilize Interleaving in Learning Confusable Categories? The Role of Metastrategic Knowledge and Utility Value of Distinguishing. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09902-0

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Ordinal regression on metacognitive preference in Experiment 1 (N = 190): "a significant impact of utility value, β = 0.77, SE = 0.38, Wald χ2 = 4.10, df = 1, p = 0.044"; only the test statistic is printed, no effect size.

"We found a significant impact of utility value, β = 0.77, SE = 0.38, Wald χ2 = 4.10, df = 1, p = 0.044, indicating a higher preference for interleaving when the utility value of distinguishing is high."

Roman Abel 2024 (2)

Roman Abel, Anique de Bruin, Erdem Onan, Julian Roelle. (2024). Why Do Learners (Under)Utilize Interleaving in Learning Confusable Categories? The Role of Metastrategic Knowledge and Utility Value of Distinguishing. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09902-0

q3 · i? · causal · r2

The same ordinal regression showed "a significant impact of differences matter instruction, β = 0.79, SE = 0.38, Wald χ2 = 4.29, df = 1, p = 0.038"; the interaction was not significant (p = 0.172).

"We also found a significant impact of differences matter instruction, β = 0.79, SE = 0.38, Wald χ2 = 4.29, df = 1, p = 0.038, indicating learners' higher preference for interleaving when being informed that differences matter for distinguishing."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id metacognitive-preference-main-effects-exp1
title In Experiment 1, metacognitive preference for interleaving showed main effects of utility value and differences-matter instruction without an interaction
description In Experiment 1, metacognitive preference for interleaving showed main effects of utility value and differences-matter instruction without an interaction
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — roman-abel-2024, roman-abel-2024-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.