Claims

Metacognitive strategy instruction improves EFL student-teachers' listening comprehension relative to traditional instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group significantly outperformed the control group on the post-test (t = 6.13 for Post-test I; t = 11.5 for Post-test II). → Whitehead 2019

Evidence

Whitehead 2019

Evangelin Whitehead. (2019). Application of Meta-Cognitive Strategy Instruction in Listening Comprehension to the Level III Student-Teachers. The Excellence in Education Journal, 8(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1228050

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test comparison of 34 experimental and 34 control student-teachers. Experimental Post-test I mean was 52.4 versus control 41, with t = 6.13 significant at 0.05; the article reports "a significant difference existed between these two scores".

"The mean value of the experimental group’s Post-test 1 was 52.4. The mean value of the control group’s Post-test was 41. The comparison of these two scores demonstrated that a significant difference existed between these two scores in that the 't' value is 6.13 which is significant at 0.05 level of significance."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.