Claims

Two formative evaluations of a MetaLinks hyperbook were conducted

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r? · q1
Currency · newest study 2003 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The article gives the results of two formative evaluations of a MetaLinks hyperbook. → Tom Murray 2003

Evidence

Tom Murray 2003

Tom Murray. (2003). MetaLinks: Authoring and Affordances for Conceptual and Narrative Flow in Adaptive Hyperbooks. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13, pp.199-233. https://telearn.hal.science/hal-00197317

q1 · i? · design · r?

The article's own statement of its evaluation component: it reports the results of "two formative evaluations of a MetaLinks Hyperbook". Formative evaluation results are reported; no effect size is printed in the available text.

"In this paper we describe the MetaLinks system, discuss a number of hyperbook design issues, and give the results of two formative evaluations of a MetaLinks Hyperbook."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id metalinks-two-formative-evaluations
title Two formative evaluations of a MetaLinks hyperbook were conducted
description Two formative evaluations of a MetaLinks hyperbook were conducted
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2003
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — tom-murray-2003

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.