Claims

Most mental health nursing assessment tools target specific competences such as physical health and therapeutic restraint, with fewer addressing crosscutting competences

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2031: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Validated tools were most commonly associated with specific competences such as therapeutic restraint or physical health, while fewer tools addressed general and crosscutting competences. → Calvo Javier Sanz 2026

Evidence

Calvo Javier Sanz 2026

Calvo Javier Sanz, Renghea Mariana Alina, García-Madrid Mercedes Gómez del Pulgar. (2026). Assessment of Mental Health Nurses’ Competences: A Scoping Review. Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría. https://doi.org/10.62641/aep.v54i3.2069

q2 · i? · review · r2

Mapping of the 100 identified tools in the scoping review. The review reports validated tools cluster on "specific competences such as therapeutic restraint or physical health", naming the ACMQ and PHASe as examples; no effect size is printed.

"Validated tools were most commonly associated with specific competences such as therapeutic restraint or physical health. Examples of such tools include the Attitudes towards Containment Measures Questionnaire (ACMQ) and the Physical Health Attitude Scale for Mental Health Nurses (PHASe)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.