Claims

A science learning video integrated with a local MHP plant improves junior high students' science process skills more than PowerPoint images-narration

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students taught with the local-potential-integrated video achieved a higher normalized gain in SPS (g = 0.42, medium) than the control group taught with PPT (g = 0.22, low). → Wilujeng 2020

Evidence

Wilujeng 2020

Wilujeng, I., Suryadarma, I. G. P., Ertika, & Dwandaru, W. S. B. (2020). Local Potential Integrated Science Video to Improve SPS and Concept Mastery. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 197-214. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13413a

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental non-equivalent control group study with 28 students per class; SPS measured by non-test observation of observing and communicating skills. The experimental class posttest average rose from 58.57 to 75.96, and "the g scores of the experimental and control groups are 0.42 and 0.22".

"Moreover, the g scores of the experimental and control groups are 0.42 and 0.22, which are categorized as medium and low, respectively. The improvement of students’ SPS in the experimental group is higher than the control group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.