Claims

Students reflected more positively on multiple intelligences activities than on traditional instruction, reporting the lessons more interesting, enjoyable and easier to learn from

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Design limits · Zennure Elgün Gündüz 2016: groups were assigned but students were analysed as independent (read from the study by two models, 2026-11-01)

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Interviewed experimental-group students said MI-based lessons were more interesting and enjoyable and helped them attend and learn more easily. → Zennure Elgün Gündüz 2016

Evidence

Zennure Elgün Gündüz 2016

Zennure Elgün Gündüz, İsmail Doğan Ünal. (2016). Effects of Multiple Intelligences Activities on Writing Skill Development in an EFL Context. Universal Journal of Educational Research 4(7): 1687-1697. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040722

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Qualitative interviews with ten randomly selected students after post-testing, plus researcher observations; students reported enjoying games and repeated use of vocabulary. The article offers these reflections as interpretive support, with no quantitative attitude measure.

"The students said they the lessons instructed through MI -based activities were more interesting and enjoyable for them. Therefore, they could pay attention to the lessons and learn more easily."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.